US trustbusters’ red faces match legal red tape


A UnitedHealth Group health insurance card is seen in a wallet in this picture illustration October 14, 2019. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/Illustration

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

NEW YORK, Sept 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) – America’s antitrust enforcers can’t catch a legal break. Some 18 days after the US Federal Trade Commission lost a key case, a court on Monday ruled against trustbusters at the Department of Justice seeking to stop insurers UnitedHealth’s (UNH.N) $8 billion takeover of claims processor Change Healthcare (CHNG.O). Unless they start scoring court wins, competition hawks’ legacy may be less stopping M&A than making it more painful.

UnitedHealth’s victory, which followed 20 months of investigation and litigation, confirms that merger reviews generally are becoming more onerous. Change’s counsel argued in court that the DoJ’s hard line may dissuade participants in a merger from working with enforcers to come up with potential remedies that lessen the impact of consolidation. Instead, parties may figure out such sweeteners, like possible divestitures, on their own. Defending these proposals in court further pushes up the potential cost of dealmaking.

The rising expense hasn’t dissuaded UnitedHealth from pursuing further acquisitions, like its $5.4 billion purchase of LHC in March. Deep-pocketed giants can afford to take a stand on deals. The risk of bigger legal bills could discourage some merger hopefuls. But the Biden administration remains a long way from fundamentally changing the competitive landscape. (By Jonathan Guilford)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Follow @Breakingviews on Twitter

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are their own.)

Capital Calls – More concise insights on global finance:

Big SPAC unwind has consequences for few read more

Oyo will check into public markets in better shape read more

Ralph Lauren sells luxury at too steep a discount read more

Collapsed French merger sends bad TV signal read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Sharon Lam

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.

Related Posts